
Probe allegations against Kelantan prince
Letter to Malaysiakini from Frankly Xroy | Jun 2, 09 5:38pm

In the first place Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak who, according to your reports, knew this prince, was shielded from the Indonesian press seeking answers from him during his recent trip to Jakarta.
Secondly you report that she was raped at the age of fifteen. If indeed there was any form of sexual relations with her at that age where penetration took place, regardless if there was consent or not on her part, it is rape. Sexual intercourse with a minor is statutory rape and if that is the case, it has to be treated accordingly.

The intervention of the Indonesian and American officials coupled with the assistance of the Singapore police in this case goes to show that this is not merely a ‘personal problem' as suggested by our deputy prime minister - it goes further than that.
This attitude of our top brass has now been ingrained in their mindset in that all these things seem to trifle for them and that there is no need to interfere. We have had too many of such incidents here where they seem to accuse innocent people of heinous crimes and overlook the really serious allegations.

I am sure we can have independent testimony for the same from the Singapore police, the American officials and the Indonesian officials.
‘To date, we have not been dragged into it, so we want to leave it as it is,' the Malaysian deputy prime minister told reporters in Kuala Lumpur, AFP reported.
However, he did not say that at an earlier stage, the prime Minister of Malaysia steered himself clear of the press regarding this issue in Indonesia.

The Malaysian deputy prime minister should also be aware that Manohara's mother was refused entry into Malaysia and that the official mouthpiece of the government carried an article of Ms Pinot smiling in the presence of the prince indicating all was alright.
The government needs to investigate the allegations of criminal assault, statutory rape, or rape whichever the case may be, abduction and the drugging of a person in captivity on one side and malicious talk against our royalty on the other.
This has to be done transparently to ensure our good name is kept intact.
Whether this government is capable of such an exercise after all the recent events in this country is something we are not too confident about.
Will our foreign minister want to go back to Washington again and meet with Hillary Clinton?
Alleged royal violence not a 'personal matter'
Prema Devaraj | Jun 2, 09 5:36pm
We refer to the Malaysiakini report Manohara: I was treated like an animal.
The Women's Centre for Change Penang (WCC) views with great concern the allegations made by Indonesian teenager, Manohara Odelia Pinot regarding the physical, emotional and sexual violence she has endured in her marriage to Kelantan Prince, Tengku Temenggong Mohammad Fakhry.
WCC is glad to see that the Foreign Affairs Ministry has offered to help if Manohara files a complaint and we would strongly encourage Manohara to file a complaint, as well as lodge a police report so that investigations can commence.
Domestic violence is a criminal offence. Under the Domestic Violence Act (1994), domestic violence includes causing or threatening to cause physical injury, confining a person, damaging property or forcing a person to do something she can legally refuse to do.

Domestic violence has been increasing steadily in recent years. In 2007, there were 3,756 cases of domestic violence reported to the police nationwide. These figures are said to only represent the tip of the iceberg as many victims tend to keep silent over the abuse they receive.
Many are ignorant of the Domestic Violence Act (1994) which can actually help protect victims from further abuse.
WCC views with deep concern the comments made by the Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin regarding Manohara's allegations.
He was reported as saying "...this is more a personal matter' and ‘...so we want to leave it as it is."
WCC would like to stress that domestic violence is not a personal matter, but is of public concern, given that it is a crime.
To have a Malaysian leader trivialise allegations of domestic violence indicates that violence against women is still not understood nor taken seriously.
Given the Malaysian government's commitment to the passing of the Domestic Violence Act (1994) and as a signatory to the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, the government is duty bound to investigate these allegations.
The writer is programme director, Women's Centre for Change, Penang (WCC).
Questions.
ReplyDeleteHow is it that she was married at such age? Was the decision hers to make? What about her parents' consent? How long did she know the prince? How long was the courtship? What was she thinking of in accepting marriage at such young age?
Boggle the mind to think of the whole issue of both parties and not to mention that of both families. Was he her prince who came one day bearing nightmare later?
Dear mf,
ReplyDeleteI like the analogy you put forth but the multitude of questions are no business of ours. To me, it is akin to a friend coming out asking - How does your wife like to take it ? Get the drift mf ! Let's look beyond the sheets and start questioning the allegations.
The press had news of a dramatic incident in Saudi Arabia(back in February). Allegations of Manohara being detained against her will, literally took flight while her mother was left standing on the tarmac. The palace countered the news with a press photo of the 'happy couple' enjoying an evening out.
All seems well on the PR front but the cracks were beginning to show itself when Daisy(mum) was denied entry into M'sia.
Doesn't this ring a bell as to how brazen the 'hidden hand' is hard at work ? Remember how, during departure from KLIA, Altantuya's cousin and friend found their immigration details erased !!!
In my mind, were there intentions or a plan hatched to wipe out ALL three girls ?
Perhaps, this is a question best left answered by one Musa Safri, whose hands was all over Altantuya's shallow grave but there have been no mention or sightings of this very sinister character.
Regards mf and Antares.
It won't be long before the name 'Manohara' cannot be mentioned openly.
ReplyDeleteI am not convinced that all is as is made out to be.
ReplyDeleteFirst of all, a Muslim is deemed an adult upon attaining puberty. So her marriage was probably legitimate under Syariah.
Secondly, the mother comes across as money-grabbing. I suspect that a financial deal either went sour or was pushed too far.
Thirdly, the girl's demeanour upon return to Indon is not that of an abuse victim. Last I heard, she had failed twice to attend a medical examination.
Let us wait for all facts to emerge before condemning anyone.
Agree, we all are very anxious of waiting the truth. however we should wait and dont jump the gun.
ReplyDeleteManohara's age when she married the Kelantan prince is not an issue here - although she was allegedly RAPED prior to the wedding when she was 15. Manohara's mother, Daisy Fajarina, comes across as worldly-wise and acutely conscious of her younger daughter's "market worth" as a trophy wife for someone rich and powerful. At 15 Manohara was already a popular model and actress. I'm sure she often fantasized about meeting a charming prince or dragon-slaying hero. So she may have been thrilled to be introduced to TT at a gala party hosted by party animal #1 Mr Pink Lips himself. The circumstances under which she was allegedly raped have not been revealed. Was it with Daisy's unspoken consent? I wouldn't leave my 15-year-old daughter alone in the company of such worldly and ruthlessly randy men. Clearly, TT was deemed "a good catch" for a celeb model. I'm not fuddy-duddy about "statutory rape" myself - it's just that I do not condone rape (to me coercion is a big NO-NO). Anyway, being flirtatious and vivacious does not prepare a 16-year-old for the drastic life changes of being married to a member of Malaysian royalty (who are notoriously schizophrenic, putting up a great show of false piety in public while
ReplyDeleteindulging in all varieties of decadence in private). It's understandable that within weeks of her marriage, Manohara realized her mistake and wanted out. That's when she fled back to Jakarta in October 2008. What persuaded Daisy and Manohara to meet TT in Mecca the following February? If Manohara was ready for a reconciliation, TT wouldn't have had to "abduct" her. I suspect there was a financial settlement involved. From long observation of testosterone-driven behavior, there are many macho male egos that cannot abide being dumped by a mere woman. They will do anything and everything to win back the runaway wife or girlfriend... so they can have the satisfaction of ditching them afterwards. I pity those born in a palace. They have no real life of their own and often go rotten from sheer brattish boredom and petulance.
let's go to 'international court' !
ReplyDeletepls read 'the might of the pen' blog
for more ....!
so dangerous... because this girl
ReplyDeletewww.penulisan2u.net