"Violence against sexuality and the use of sexuality for violence, particularly against women, has very deep roots in Biblical tradition." ~ James W. Prescott (National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland)
A neuropsychologist contends that the greatest threat to world peace comes from those nations which have the most depriving environments for their children and which are most repressive of sexual affection and female sexuality.
BODY PLEASURE AND THE ORIGINS OF VIOLENCE
By James W. Prescott
Human violence is fast becoming a global epidemic. All over the world, police face angry mobs, terrorists disrupt the Olympics, hijackers seize airplanes, and bombs wreck buildings. During the past year, wars raged in the Middle East, Cyprus, and Southeast Asia, and guerrilla fighting continued to escalate in Ireland. Meanwhile, crime in the United States grew even faster than inflation. Figures from the Federal Bureau of Investigation show that serious crimes rose 16 percent in the first six months of 1974 - one of the largest crime increases since FBI record-keeping began.
Unless the causes of violence are isolated and treated, we will continue to live in a world of fear and apprehension. Unfortunately, violence is often offered as a solution to violence. Many law enforcement officials advocate 'get tough' policies as the best method to reduce crime. Imprisoning people, our usual way of dealing with crime, will not solve the problem, because the causes of violence lie in our basic values and the way in which we bring up our children and youth. Physical punishment, violent films and TV programs teach our children that physical violence is normal. But these early life experiences are not the only or even the main source of violent behavior. Recent research supports the point of view that the deprivation of physical pleasure is a major ingredient in the expression of physical violence. The common association of sex with violence provides a clue to understanding physical violence in terms of deprivation of physical pleasure.
Unlike violence, pleasure seems to be something the world can't get enough of. People are constantly in search of new forms of pleasure, yet most of our 'pleasure' activities appear to be substitutes for the natural sensory pleasures of touching. We touch for pleasure or for pain or we don't touch at all. Although physical pleasure and physical violence seem worlds apart, there seems to be a subtle and intimate connection between the two. Until the relationship between pleasure and violence is understood, violence will continue to escalate.
As a developmental neuropsychologist I have devoted a great deal of study to the peculiar relationship between violence and pleasure. I am now convinced that the deprivation of physical sensory pleasure is the principal root cause of violence. Laboratory experiments with animals show that pleasure and violence have a reciprocal relationship, that is, the presence of one inhibits the other. A raging, violent animal will abruptly calm down when electrodes stimulate the pleasure centers of its brain. Likewise, stimulating the violence centers in the brain can terminate the animal's sensual pleasure and peaceful behavior. When the brain's pleasure circuits are 'on,' the violence circuits are 'off,' and vice versa. Among human beings, a pleasure-prone personality rarely displays violence or aggressive behaviors, and a violent personality has little ability to tolerate, experience, or enjoy sensuously pleasing activities. As either violence or pleasure goes up, the other goes down.
Sensory Deprivation
The reciprocal relationship of pleasure and violence is highly significant because certain sensory experiences during the formative periods of development will create a neuropsychological predisposition for either violence-seeking or pleasure-seeking behaviors later in life. I am convinced that various abnormal social and emotional behaviors resulting from what psychologists call 'maternal-social' deprivation, that is, a lack of tender, loving care, are caused by a unique type of sensory deprivation, somatosensory deprivation. Derived from the Greek word for 'body,' the term refers to the sensations of touch and body movement which differ from the senses of light, hearing, smell and taste. I believe that the deprivation of body touch, contact, and movement are the basic causes of a number of emotional disturbances which include depressive and autistic behaviors, hyperactivity, sexual aberration, drug abuse, violence, and aggression.
These insights were derived chiefly from the controlled laboratory studies of Harry F. and Margaret K. Harlow at the University of Wisconsin. The Harlows and their students separated infant monkeys from their mothers at birth. The monkeys were raised in single cages in an animal colony room, where they could develop social relationships with the other animals through seeing, hearing, and smelling, but not through touching or movement. These and other studies indicate that it is the deprivation of body contact and body movement - not deprivation of the other senses - that produces the wide variety of abnormal emotional behaviors in these isolation-reared animals. It is well known that human infants and children who are hospitalized or institutionalized for extended periods with little physical touching and holding develop almost identical abnormal behaviors, such as rocking and head banging.
Although the pathological violence observed in isolation-reared monkeys is well documented, the linking of early somatosensory deprivation with physical violence in humans is less well established. Numerous studies of juvenile delinquents and adult criminals have shown a family background of broken homes and/or physically abusive parents. These studies have rarely mentioned, let alone measured, the degree of deprivation of physical affection, although this is often inferred from the degree of neglect and abuse.
One exceptional study in this respect is that of Brandt F. Steele and C.B. Pollock, psychiatrists at the University of Colorado, who studied child abuse in three generations of families who physically abused their children. They found that parents who abused their children were invariably deprived of physical affection themselves during childhood and that their adult sex life was extremely poor.
Steele noted that almost without exception the women who abused their children had never experienced orgasm. The degree of sexual pleasure experienced by the men who abused their children was not ascertained, but their sex life, in general, was unsatisfactory. The hypothesis that physical pleasure actively inhibits physical violence can be appreciated from our own sexual experiences. How many of us feel like assaulting someone after we have just experienced orgasm?
The contributions of Freud to the effects of early experiences upon later behaviors and the consequences of repressed sexuality have been well established. Unfortunately time and space do not permit a discussion here of his differences with Wilhelm Reich concerning his Beyond the Pleasure Principle.
The hypothesis that deprivation of physical pleasure results in physical violence requires a formal systematic evaluation. We can test this hypothesis by examining cross-cultural studies of child-rearing practices, sexual behaviors, and physical violence. We would expect to find that human societies which provide their infants and children with a great deal of physical affection (touching, holding, carrying) would be less physically violent than human societies which give very little physical affection to their infants and children. Similarly, human societies which tolerate and accept premarital and extramarital sex would be less physically violent than societies which prohibit and punish premarital and extramarital sex.
____
James W. Prescott, a neuropsychologist, is a health scientist administrator at the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development in Bethesda, Maryland. He is a member of the Board of Directors of the American Humanist Association. This article appeared in part in the April 1975 issue of The Futurist, published by the World Future Society, and is reprinted here with their permission. The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of the National Institutes of Health.
Read the full essay here.
Well... in Malaysia we aren't allowed to watch people kissing on TV - that's utterly haram but killing is halal. Perhaps that's why local law enforcement agents will spare no efforts to prosecute and imprison a guy accused of indulging in anal or oral sex; yet turn a blind eye to massive corruption, cruel treatment of housemaids and pets, even cold-blooded murder!
[Thanks to John Kaminski for forwarding James Prescott's article. First posted 9 September 2011]
Monday, January 27, 2014
Saturday, January 25, 2014
Bukit Merah Catastrophe Revisited (a pictorial essay)
Asian Rare Earth Sdn Bhd - a joint venture involving Mitsubishi Chemical Industries Ltd (35%), Beh Minerals (35%), Lembaga Urusan dan Tabung Haji or the state-owned Pilgrims' Management Fund Board (20%) and other bumiputra businessmen (10%) - began operations in 1982 soon after Mahathir Mohamad became prime minister. It took the residents of Bukit Merah more than 10 years of unrelenting struggle to get this lethally hazardous operation shut down. In the process, community leaders at the forefront of the protest against ARE were even arrested and detained under the obnoxious ISA by order of the vindictive home minister, Mahathir Mohamad...
And now, under the nefarious Najib Razak, history is about to repeat itself...
unless we topple this lethally hazardous, ecocidal and utterly corrupt BN regime!
[First posted 3 March 2012]
Saturday, January 18, 2014
THE EVENT ~ by MC SuperKenn + 2013 A-Z with Marc the Arcturian!
Published 15 January 2014
Published on 28 November 2012
Heard of the Photon Belt? Pole Shift? Precession of Equinoxes?
Nibiru, Solar Storms, The Mayan Calendar or Biblical Prophecy?
With over 30 yrs in Radio & TV Broadcasting, Boulder Professor Marc "The Arcturian" takes you on this Galaxial Tour in: "The Most Comprehensive 60 Minutes On "2012" Ever Assembled."
Over 4G/1,200 Photos, Clips, Animations, Slides and SFX went into this video of Disneyesque Proportion even Bill didn't know you could make when you let a deranged professor play with his PowerPoint 2010 (60 Day Trial Version) for three months :)
May The Force Be With Us All!
Sunday, January 12, 2014
After UMNO elections: What next for Mahathir? ~ by KP Chee
Mahathir is a quick thinking
political animal who believes he has an answer to every question and a solution
for every problem. His visions of development are on a pharaonic scale and he
is a law unto himself. He has never
concealed his disdain for democratic ideals, lamenting that the Great Unwashed
are not quite ready to think for themselves.
Having ensured while he was
education minister that students be vigorously discouraged, if not disallowed,
from independent thought, he secretly feels that the ignorant and dull-witted
masses should not be allowed to vote. Elections, therefore, are seen as a
necessary evil but - with a little help from a compliant election commission
and national registration department - they can be circumvented by systematic gerrymandering,
postal and phantom votes, and a heavily rigged electoral roll. So long as the
votes are in his favor, Mahathir will tolerate the concept of a guided
democracy.
Pushed to step down when he became a grave liability
To ensure that he remained in power
indefinitely, he made the post of Umno president virtually unchallengeable. He
sacked every deputy who posed a serious threat to his dominance, and promoted
self-serving spineless sycophants to ministerial positions. He castrated the
monarchy in 1983, thus paving the way to ultimately appointing himself lifetime
President of a gleaming new Malaysian republic – but he knew he had to bide his
time with this grandiose ambition.
![]() |
| Anwar Ibrahim, antidote to Mahathirism |
Alas, he had not reckoned with the
tenacity of his erstwhile deputy Anwar Ibrahim - whom he sacked in September
1998 and then proceeded to crucify with an unimaginably malicious campaign to
forever destroy his reputation and career. Anwar stood his ground and
maintained his dignity, despite being imprisoned for 6 years on fabricated
charges. Mahathir’s vindictiveness backfired and Anwar’s popularity began to
escalate, splitting the Malays into opposing camps.
On 31 October 2003 Mahathir was
forced to step down because he had become a grave liability to Umno – or,
rather Umno Baru, the ersatz party Mahathir conjured into being in 1988 through
sheer sleight of hand. But that didn’t stop Mahathir from daydreaming of a
political dynasty. After all, his political enemies had established their own
dynasties – why should he not aspire to the same?
Frankenstein's monster
![]() |
| Abdullah Badawi |
Working indefatigably behind the
scenes Mahathir used his vast resources and an influential cabal of loyalists
to undermine his successors, Abdullah Badawi and Najib Razak. Age was against
Mahathir, so he would focus on ruling by proxy through his youngest son
Mukhriz. Finally he managed to get Mukhriz, a political nonentity, appointed
Mentri Besar of Kedah, Mahathir’s home state. The next step was to ensure
Mukhriz a vice-presidency in Umno.
Despite all his efforts Mahathir has
failed to get what he wants for his son Mukhriz. Like all megalomaniacs,
Mahathir surrounded himself with devotees and worshipers, effectively insulating
himself from the growing resentment and hostility of an increasingly
well-informed electorate. His inflamed ego refused to accept the possibility
that he was no longer relevant to the swiftly changing political landscape.
Umno Baru, the Frankenstein’s
monster with a voracious appetite for instant riches that Dr Mahathir created,
had acquired a will of its own and was no longer obedient to its creator.
Choosing between two evils - Hisham and Mukhriz
Now let us consider the winning
candidates in Umno’s recent elections.
![]() |
| Zahid Hamidi |
Zahid Hamidi had campaigned
vigorously to win the elections. As newly appointed home minister, Zahid had
the advantage of incumbency and he rode the wave of communal paranoia stirred
up by Mahathir to keep the races divided and easily misruled.
Hishammuddin Hussein has a long and
established family history in politics and government -plus he has Najib’s
support and consent. The fact that he won by only a narrow margin indicates his
failure to impress as a leader. Between Najib and Mahathir’s camps, the
sentiment was less in Hishammuddin’s favor than it was against Mahathir getting
his way – and the lion’s share of the goodies - once again.
Shafie Apdal is basically a lone
ranger and a newbie in national politics but he has the advantage of being an
important minister at the federal level and has been in that position for
almost two terms. This is the main factor that enabled Shafie to build
nationwide support among the grassroots.
![]() |
| Mukhriz Mahathir |
Mukhriz Mahathir, on the other hand,
was hesitant and only announced his candidacy at the last minute. He lacked
self-confidence and could only resort to empty bluster. After entering the race
he depended on his campaign manager, none other than his wily father, to
promote him. As the youngest Mahathir scion, Mukhriz always had it easy. He
made his fortune on business monopolies handed to him on a silver platter. So
Mukhriz just sat back and hoped for the best.
Najib tricked Mahathir
Mahathir underestimated Najib, who
cunningly appeased Mahathir by agreeing to Mukhriz’s appointment as Mentri
Besar of Kedah, where he could play big fish in a small pond – but without
national level support, Mukhriz was unlikely to make much of a splash in Umno
Baru’s vice-presidential contest.
Mahathir has several strategies
![]() |
| Najib Razak |
Until he achieves his objectives,
Mahathir won’t leave well enough alone. That’s the nature of the vicious
political beast in him - and he certainly won’t leave Najib Razak alone.
Mahathir the Unstoppable may have officially relinquished the post of Umno Baru
president and prime minister, but his unrelenting ego ensures that nothing
short of death will bring his insatiable powerlust to an end. Even then, he
will not quickly be forgotten, as the administrative mess he left behind will
take at least another generation to sort out.
Those who thwart Mahathir’s will
face the full force of his vengeance. The man who ruled with an iron hand for
22 years is now on a do-or-die mission to reinstate his political influence and
protect his self-aggrandizing legacy.
Mahathir knows he cannot do it on his own
![]() |
| Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah |
Mahathir cannot defeat Najib on his
own. He must have a team, the same scenario that Ku Li used when challenging
Mahathir, with Team A pitted against Team B.
Mahathir realizes that his power is
diminishing by the day, and the first thing he must do is to consolidate whatever
resources he still controls.
Since many of the UMNO leaders are
now bowing to Najib and kissing his hand, Mahathir has to get help from outside
UMNO: independent players, ultra-Malay NGOs and mercenary bloggers. He will
have to spend a lot of money, which he can, of course, afford.
He will have to win the hearts of
Najib’s enemies within Umno Baru. Fallen leaders like former Melaka Mentri
Besar Ali Rustam who yearns to be restored to power and glory; Idris Jusoh, who
covets the post of the Menteri Besar of Terengganu; and a handful who were
offered obscure posts but dream of greater things. These are the ones who can
be persuaded to be on Mahathir’s side.
Drawing strength from other stakeholders
![]() |
| Ultra-rightwing Malay NGO president Zaik Abdul Rahman |
Mahathir will welcome those in the business
community who have been left out by Najib - and there are quite a few of them
now. They too are waiting for Mahathir to do something to make the situation
right for them because Najib and Rosmah have closed the doors in their faces.
Mahathir has to ensure that media
like TV3 and Utusan will give him enough exposure to voice his thoughts, if not
put him in the limelight so he can overshadow Najib. Mahathir still has his
loyalists in these media - and he has to ‘persuade’ those who are pro-Najib to
not totally ignore him.
Besides empowering himself, Mahathir
has to weaken Najib by sabotaging his network and loosening his grip. Mahathir
has no choice but to depend on previous scandals and any new ones that may crop
up: revive the old ones and blow the new ones out of proportion.
Mahathir need not worry too much
about getting external help to tarnish Najib’s image because numerous NGOs and
the Opposition are already doing this.
Modus operandi - Attack, attack, attack
Mahathir now has to attack Najib by
undermining Najib’s closest associates, his friends and family members.
Mahathir will attempt to ridicule, if not disgrace, all of Najib’s appointees.
The dust hasn’t really settled on
the recent Umno Baru elections. Not by a long shot.
[From Malaysia Chronicle, 27 October 2013]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

















































